For
those wondering why the morticious title, I haven’t blogged in a while. Today, a fellow kofer (okay, a rather celebrated
one who will be shouted out in a subsequent post) asked why my last few posts
had nothing to do with the title of my blog.
I actually don’t remember what I was thinking when I posted that. So instead, let me devote this to one of two
topics that have been bled to death by every poet out there; there’s enough
blogs out there talking about sex, so let me talk about death.
The
year was 2006, I think. I was taking a philosophy
class at CCNY—Metaphysics and Epistemology.
My professor, a curmudgeonly old bloke who was old enough to have taught
my father when he was at CCNY, was notoriously a tough fellow with no patience
for stupid shit. This included Z (name
omitted, you fools). Z was one of those
students who basically was like what if Jar Jar Binks was a 6 foot plus Asian
man.
One day, my professor said he doesn’t
believe in Karma. Z blurted out “professor,
I don’t think you know what Karma is.”
The professor ignored him. Z
continued “professor, don’t you want to hear what Karma is?” The professor said no, and continued on. Z continued to insist that if only the
professor would listen to him, he could convince him that Karma is real. Finally, the professor gave in. So Z explained “it’s just a fancy way of
saying ‘what goes around comes around’ and ‘you get what you deserve’.” To which the professor curtly replied “that
is the stupidest definition of Karma I’ve ever heard in my entire life!” And then he want back to teaching without further
ado.
---
---
The
above story just about illustrates how I feel about most kiruv arguments I’m exposed
to nowadays. But that’s not why I bring
it up.
Here’s
a fact. Karma might be one of the misused
loan words in the English language. Plenty
of us westerners are not familiar with the concept of transmigration of the
soul, Dharma, Samsara, et al. No, Oilam
Haba is not Jewish Karma.
The
second worst explanation I’ve heard for Karma comes from none other than Ray
Comfort. In his intro to On the
Origin of Species, Ray Comfort describes Karma as one who jumps out of a
plane and says it’s okay that he doesn’t have a parachute because when he hits
the ground, he will just be brought back into the plane inhabiting a new body
(perhaps even an animal). Comfort meant
it to show how absurd Karma is; but a bag of shit labeled eau de toilette
still smells like shit. Is Karma really
any more absurd than belief that only Jesus can save your soul?
I will say this. I don’t want to end up in a Christian heaven
anyway. Sounds fucking boring.
---
---
What
is the Jewish view on resurrection anyway?
Like many other things, there seems to be no unified answer to that question. There is a concept of gilgulim (resurrection),
but at the same time there is an afterlife.
But even then, the Torah spoke of she’ol (abyss), and only in later
sources do we see any mention of anything other than that.
I
was in my late teens when I learned that Hell is a Christian concept, and that
Gehenom is actually more of a purgatory.
But then, there’s also the concepts of dybbuks, demons, and other such
concepts.
Can
one believe in resurrection, an afterlife, and neither of the above at the same
time?
It seems that to be a frum Jew, one
has to resign themselves to believing all three at the same time. Doesn’t make sense? “Hamayvin Yavin”, “Eilu V’Eilu”, “Teiku”, and
all those other things the maggid shiur rebbe would tell you to cover up the
fact that he didn’t know the answer either.
---
This is just another one of those subjects that normative Judaism does not have a good answer to. In fact, I will go out and say that other than some of those Dybbuk stories I read up on when I was in yeshiva, the Jewish concept is actually kind of boring. Christians have an entire faith based on it, enough that some of their greatest artwork centers around that theme (if you haven’t seen Raphael’s famous painting on the Ressurection, what the fuck are you waiting for? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resurrection_of_Christ_(Raphael) ).
This is just another one of those subjects that normative Judaism does not have a good answer to. In fact, I will go out and say that other than some of those Dybbuk stories I read up on when I was in yeshiva, the Jewish concept is actually kind of boring. Christians have an entire faith based on it, enough that some of their greatest artwork centers around that theme (if you haven’t seen Raphael’s famous painting on the Ressurection, what the fuck are you waiting for? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resurrection_of_Christ_(Raphael) ).
There
were many questions I had in yeshiva that Rabbinic Judaism just didn’t have a
satisfactory answer for. During my
moratorium years, I wanted to have faith and assume that eventually I would find
that magical rabbi who could explain that shit away and make me believe forever. Good thing I didn’t hold my breath. Because similar to my namesake seeing the child
fall off the rickety ladder, I realized that the simplest explanation is the
best one. No, they don’t have the
answers. But rest assured, neither do I.
No comments:
Post a Comment